Erm…ok. This article quotes a CDC research finding that declares children living in a nuclear family: “that is, in families consisting of two married adults who are the biological or adoptive parents of all children in the family”, are healthier than those living in non-nuclear families. The link this article first provides is to a christian website that states these CDC findings are not talking about married gay couples because it is a federal report and because of DOMA they do not recognize such marriages.
Whether this is true or not the study goes on to state: “The findings in this report cannot be used to infer that family structure ‘‘caused’’ a particular child health outcome or that a child health outcome ‘‘caused’’ family structure. In fact, previous research has shown that causality may flow in both directions; that is, family structure may have consequences for child health outcomes, while children’s health may have consequences for family structure (42,43).”
In addition what this study cannot conclude is whether the inability for most gay couples to be married and to adopt on a nationwide level at the same time, affects the outcome of those that have adopted but not necessarily have married. This study does not take into account the negative externalities of the DOMA law on the ability for children in a household with two gay parents to benefit from health insurance and other protections granted to heterosexual couples (without sound reasoning or defense besides it being against Christianity, even though the Bible fails to mention “traditional marriage” but rather the exact opposite in it’s heros’ lives.)
-
croatia-holiday-apartments reblogged this from azspot
-
bol-croatia reblogged this from azspot
-
gaymerlibertarian reblogged this from gaymerlibertarian
-
sendmelies liked this
-
anotherword liked this
-
ultramatic liked this
-
onacrazychain liked this
-
apoplecticskeptic liked this
-
thismatterofculture liked this
-
ub14 liked this
-
bluntlyblue reblogged this from azspot
-
calloutgouranga liked this
-
midnight-cowboy liked this
-
jjarichardson reblogged this from azspot
-
elizmayerle liked this
-
pandorasmittens reblogged this from azspot and added:
some… interesting… rhetoric. This is what really gets me: 1. The Permanence of Marriage as God’s Institution No matter...
-
chadmax40 reblogged this from azspot
-
redcloud liked this
-
buchino liked this
-
citizenkerry liked this
-
-xbox-live reblogged this from azspot
-
azspot reblogged this from sds and added:
I promised an evisceration of this piece titled Top 10 Reasons I Am Optimistic About Natural Marriage…
-
spiderfrost liked this
-
aubfergie liked this
-
beacee liked this
-
randomreagae liked this
-
whatnowitsbrit liked this
-
existenceandidentity liked this
-
tellittothecleaningladyonmonday liked this
-
amydrake liked this
-
ardenashley liked this
-
wind-upbird liked this
-
ajamison liked this
-
notyouraveragemichael reblogged this from apoplecticskeptic and added:
Hahahaha because we all know that “natural marriage” always ends happily, there’s never been a straight divorce in the...
-
aliceinwonderbread liked this
-
apsies liked this
-
thecaptainoftheship365 liked this
-
azspot said:
O the FUD, historical inaccuracy, logic errors, disinformation, and hateful slant (or latent appeal to bigotry)… …tonight I shall tackle and eviscerate…
-
hathu liked this
-
avatarsnowy reblogged this from apoplecticskeptic
-
apoplecticskeptic reblogged this from sds and added:
Sorry gays! Your marriage will never be natural or true, but unnatural and built on lies! Anyway, I preferred Volume 1...
-
sds posted this